Palace defends martial law declaration
By Paolo Romero (The Philippine Star) Updated March 31, 2010 12:00 AM
|
| |
MANILA, Philippines - Despite the dismissal of the rebellion case against former governor Andal Ampatuan
Sr. and six others, Malacañang said there was justification for its declaration of a weeklong martial law in
Maguindanao in the wake of the Nov. 23 slaughter of 57 journalists, lawyers and members of a political clan.
“We continue to stand by the public policy wisdom of the declaration of martial law in Maguindanao, if you
look at the positive outcomes from that declaration as well as the manner it was conducted,” deputy
presidential spokesman Gary Olivar said.
Olivar noted that Quezon City Judge Vivencio Baclig, in his decision, merely ruled out probable cause for
rebellion and “did not speak for the broader issue of the appropriateness of declaring martial law at that
time, at that place.”
Armed Forces of the Philippines chief Gen. Delfin Bangit also said there was basis for the rebellion case
against some members of the powerful clan.
“There are options available. We can appeal the court decision. We will present the evidence when we make
the appeal,” Bangit said in an interview.
“The decision has been handed down by the court. We uphold the rule of law and we follow the legal
process,” AFP spokesman Lt. Col. Arnulfo Burgos Jr. said. “We will tap means that are within the bounds of
law to allow the case to prosper.”
President Arroyo declared martial law in Maguindanao on Dec. 4 after authorities warned that armed
followers of Ampatuan were mobilizing and that local government operations, including the courts, were no
longer functioning.
Olivar also assured the families of the massacre victims of speedy justice despite the junking of the
rebellion case.
“This is an initial reversal that the prosecution has experienced but these things happen. You win some, you
lose some,” Olivar said.
“But we will persevere for justice for the victims,” he said. “This is not yet over.”
He stressed the dismissal was unlikely to affect the separate multiple murder charges against the
Ampatuans.
Olivar also rebuffed allegations that the dismissal of the rebellion case was a compromise with the
Ampatuans, known allies of President Arroyo.
“There’s a malicious speculation that the rebellion charges were dismissed to allow a backdoor for the
Ampatuans. Again, this is wildly speculative, there’s no evidence offered for it,” he said.
“And to suggest through this kind of speculation that the Palace is interested in getting accused-murderers
scot-free in exchange for so-called political debts is really almost slander against people running the
executive branch,” Olivar said.
No rejoicing
For most Ampatuans in Shariff Aguak, there is no reason to rejoice over the dismissal of the rebellion
charges against their detained clan leaders since they are still facing a graver case of multiple murder.
“Those we believe who are innocent, but were also charged, can now focus on proving their innocence in the
brutal massacre in Barangay Salman (in Ampatuan town) last year,” said an elderly Ampatuan, who asked
not to be identified.
Most members of the closely-related Ampatuan and Sangki clans here and in nearby towns are convinced
the massacre of 57 people last year in Barangay Salman involved only two or three clan leaders.
“We can’t speak more. That’s our honest belief,” a public school teacher married to an Ampatuan said.
A Quezon City judge on Monday dismissed the rebellion case against Andal Ampatuan Sr. and six members
of his powerful clan. The Ampatuans, however, remain in detention because they are facing multiple murder
charges also before the Quezon City Regional Trial Court.
“If there is one sector that wanted the prosecution of the suspects done without disruption, it’s us, for we too
want vindication. We were not involved in the massacre, yet we’ve been ostracized,” said another clan
member.
“We’ve stopped schooling as a consequence of our being Ampatuans.”
Victims’ families worried
Relatives and friends of the massacre victims said they were worried the multiple murder case might also
be dismissed.
“We are so dismayed. The court should not do that in the multiple murder case. We are longing for justice,
the court should handle the multiple murder case with all honesty and integrity and we are appealing for
that,” said Police Office 1 Eliver Cablitas, vice-chairman of the “Heirs of 11/23 Maguindano Heroes” and
widower of local newspaper publisher Maritess Cablitas.
“From the start, I knew the rebellion case could be dismissed. But in the multiple murder case, we have high
expectations from the very start that the court will (hand down) guilty verdict on the Ampatuans and their
accomplices,” Myrna Reblando, vice-chairman of the “Justice Now,” another organization of the victims’ kin,
told The STAR.
Weak case
The Liberal Party led by standard-bearer Sen. Benigno “Noynoy” Aquino III and his running mate Sen.
Manuel Roxas II urged the Arroyo government to file the appropriate charges against the Ampatuans and not
help them walk away by pressing weak cases such as rebellion.
“The fact that the charges were weak to begin with shows that the political alliance is still alive. Before you
know it, it will be business as usual for Mrs. Arroyo, the Ampatuans and other politicians who serve her
ends,” Aquino said.
“The government is duty bound to have them arrested and charged with the proper criminal cases that can
stand in court, not a sham case for rebellion when everyone knows there was no element of rebellion
present when the massacre occurred or even thereafter,” Sen. Aquilino Pimentel Jr. said.
“The massacre was pure and simple multiple murders of innocent people,” he stressed.
“What I am worried about is the fact that the dismissal of the case of rebellion could affect the conduct of the
multiple murder cases being tried before the sala of (Quezon City) Judge (Jocelyn) Reyes,” LP senatorial
candidate Alex Lacson said.
“The court’s finding revealed that the declaration of martial law in that part of Mindanao was just an attempt
by President Arroyo to show a semblance of being in control of a situation she had allowed to fester – that of
arming a political clan widely perceived to have been instrumental in manufacturing votes for the regime,”
businessman and senatorial candidate Joey de Venecia said.
No poll sabotage plot
Malacañang, meanwhile, denied text rumors that Executive Secretary Leandro Mendoza had threatened to
resign to protest an alleged plot by President Arroyo and other officials to derail the country’s first nationwide
automated elections.
The story, which made the rounds last night, alleged that former executive secretary Eduardo Ermita and
Mindanao Development Authority chairman Jesus Dureza hatched “a plot to sabotage the elections.”
Sought for comment, Dureza suggested that those who were spreading the rumor “breathe the mountain air
here.”
“We just attended the blessing of a big crucifix here for the Holy Week. I suggest that these people breathe
the mountain air here and cleanse their minds and hearts,” Dureza said.
Mendoza could not be reached for comment but Ermita said his successor at the Palace forwarded him the
text message.
“You know what sir, I got this ridiculous text and I will forward it to you,” Ermita quoted Mendoza as telling him.
“What they are spreading, the scenarios are out of this world, and too much of an insult to the intelligence of
Filipinos and to those who receive it,” Ermita said in a phone interview. With Aurea Calica, Christina
Mendez, Edith Regalado, Jose Rodel Clapano, Reinir Padua, Alexis Romero, Rose Tamayo-Tesoro, John
Unson
|
|
